Horrified mother tells of YouTube kiddy porn scandal

[Earl]

Just look at this fucking nonsense.

It's every Mother's worst nightmare: sexual deviants sharing videos of her innocent child and there's nothing she can do about it.

That's exactly what happened to Texas mother Kelli Clark, who uploaded a video of her son dancing in the rain wearing only a diaper.

She intended to share the video with her friends and family, but soon a predator got a hold of it and listed it on a child pornography private Youtube channel.

She had no idea what caused the sudden jump in views until a YouTube user in Sweden emailed Ms Clark to let her know that the video had been listed on a nude children private channel.

'I went to look. I was totally shocked,' Ms Clark said to Click2Houston.

She sprung into action, contacting authorities for help.

'I called the FBI and they couldn't do anything about it because they weren't his videos,' she said.

'They were other people's videos that he had collected.'

Ms Clark turned her videos to 'private,' but is reaching out to warn other parents about the dangers of the web.

'Just be careful. You think that it's an innocent video. But other people aren't looking at it like that,' Clark said.

Horrified mother discovers YouTube video of son in a diaper on sinister playlist of nude child clips | Mail Online

Yeah, the FBI couldn't do anything, because no crime had been committed. The woman puts videos of her baby online and then complains that paedos might be looking at them. Don't fucking upload them then you fucking bummer.

But FFS, where does it end? People best lock their kids indoors, in case a paedo sees them.

[timey]

Why do people think that YouTube is private, the bloody idiots? Why don't they share these videos properly and not pn a public website? Basically they are giving their private stuff away to the world and they are too thick to realise it.

[jools182]

What a pillock

[Earl]

Why do people think that YouTube is private, the bloody idiots? Why don't they share these videos properly and not pn a public website? Basically they are giving their private stuff away to the world and they are too thick to realise it.

You can set it to private, basically as far as I can see this woman didn't have a problem with people looking at her baby wearing a nappy, and why should she? I've seen babies in nappies about a million times.

The thing that changed is she now thinks perverts are looking too, but in reality they always were and always will be.

[Ck]

Do kiddy perverts fancy every kid they see? or does it work like with normal people e.g. a man might fancy women but not all women?

[timey]

You can set it to private, basically as far as I can see this woman didn't have a problem with people looking at her baby wearing a nappy, and why should she? I've seen babies in nappies about a million times.

The thing that changed is she now thinks perverts are looking too, but in reality they always were and always will be.

Yeah, exactly, that's what I am saying. Either people don't realise they are putting things public, or they do and do nothing about it then complain afterwards. If she didn't want perverts looking at her kid then she should have put them private. I'm not sure what she wants to happen. Does she want to be able to the stuff public but somehow stop paedos lookng at it, which is impossible?

[Earl]

Yeah, I imagine that's what people do want. That's part of what gets my wick about these fucking hysterical paedo spotters, they want to change the world so people don't even have freedom to think, because they want to upload videos of kids in nappies. It's ridiculous.

[Ben]

Do kiddy perverts fancy every kid they see? or does it work like with normal people e.g. a man might fancy women but not all women?

It's like the gays, they are attracted to everyone.

[Ck]

Gosh, no wonder some mums get so hysterical