Re: RONNIE BIGGS.
One was turned into a sort of folk hero, the other into the personification of evil ...
Re: RONNIE BIGGS.
Yeah and Brady can be released on life licence when no longer judged to be a risk. Well he's hardly a risk is he so he could be released just like Biggs.
Re: RONNIE BIGGS.
Biggs has done less than ten years of his original 30 year sentence, and that's not counting what he should get on top for breaking out of prison.
At least Brady has served his time. He's done over 40 years.
Re: RONNIE BIGGS.
If you, I mean any foruma, were forced to make a decision on which one to let out of prison, who would it be, Biggs or Brady?
I would release Biggs.
Re: RONNIE BIGGS.
I wouldn't release either. Neither of them has to be released, so let the fucker's rot. They should have stayed on the right side of the law.
Re: RONNIE BIGGS.
considering he got a 30 yr sentence i consider that hienous in itself in effect 3 life sentences ! and for what filthy luker . will the bastards who murdered baby P do anything like 10 yrs ? i doubt it !
Re: RONNIE BIGGS.
Me to. He has served a third of his sentence, the norm, before parole is applied for, so I would let him out now.
The main reason being, he never actually hurt anyone, he was a petty criminal, who stupidly decided to escape, rather than serve his time. Now he has, and he is incredibly ill. I think its the only humane thing to do.
Brady, is a piece of sh**, who deserves to rot in hell, which I hope he does. He will certainly rot in jail.
But how can we compare two people, one who had a part in nicking a couple of million quid, and one who actually tortured and murdered innocent children?.
Bookmarks